ScheduleLens Demo — Commercial Office Construction

5 snapshots · ordered by schedule data date

+ Add snapshot Rename

Forecast finish

ⓘ

12 Apr 2029

was 18 Feb 2029

Plan: 22 Jun 2028 +9 months 20 days late

DCMA compliance

ⓘ

9 / 14

Watch

3 fails, 2 not assessed

See full DCMA breakdown →

Critical path (wd)

ⓘ

705

+2 since prior

Activities at risk

ⓘ

+1 since prior

Float ≤ 20 wd or negative

Trend across snapshots

Grouped by what each metric is measured against.

Absolute · each schedule on its own

DCMA score

9 / 14

10 / 14 → 9 / 14 across 5 snapshots

Forecast vs plan

+9 months 20 days late

Critical path (wd)

705 wd

vs Baseline · the plan of record

BEI

0.88

Float consumed (wd)

6 wd

1 period excluded (re-baseline / re-sequence — comparison limited)

Concealed slip (wd)

ⓘ

35 wd

The live dashboard also carries a vs Prior month group (per-period moves as signed bars off a zero line). Trimmed here for the sample.

Scheduling mode changed mid-monitoring

Retained logic → Progress override at 8 Apr 2026 — figures from this snapshot on may understate slippage.

Progress Override discards predecessor logic for in-progress activities; the critical path, float, and forecast can differ materially from the same file scheduled under Retained Logic.

Data date	Type	Programme finish	DCMA	CP (wd)	At risk	Baseline	BEI (vs baseline)	Float used (vs baseline, wd)	Concealed slip (vs baseline, wd)
5 Jan 2026	Baseline Retained logic	8 Jun 2028	10 / 14	685	34	Baseline · default	—	—	—
6 May 2026	Comparison Progress override	22 Jun 2028 EV ⇒ 12 Apr 2029	9 / 14	705	44	Set	0.88	6	35
8 Apr 2026	Comparison Progress override	22 Jun 2028 EV ⇒ 18 Feb 2029	9 / 14	703	43	Set	0.90	limited	28
6 Mar 2026	Comparison Retained logic	22 Jun 2028 EV ⇒ 5 Dec 2028	9 / 14	702	41	Set	0.92	19	12
4 Feb 2026	Comparison Retained logic	15 Jun 2028 EV ⇒ 20 Aug 2028	10 / 14	690	36	Set	0.97	8	—

On the live dashboard, clicking a row opens that snapshot's full analysis report, and each row carries Forget / Detach / Delete controls (trimmed from this sample).

Ask the schedule agent

Subscriber feature

A grounded, read-only assistant that answers from the computed results across every snapshot — it never guesses.

Why has the forecast finish slipped since the baseline?

The independent earned-value forecast moved from 20 Aug 2028 (Update 1) to 12 Apr 2029 (Update 4), about 9 months 20 days behind the plan of record's 22 Jun 2028. Two signals sit underneath it: BEI fell from 0.97 to 0.88 (work is completing slower than planned), and at Update 3 the programme switched to Progress Override, after which concealed slip climbed to 35 working days as activity durations were shaved.

Ask about this project… Send

What this dashboard tells you

Forecast finish slipped from 20 Aug 2028 to 12 Apr 2029 across four monthly updates — the stored target still says June 2028, but the earned-value trajectory says April 2029, roughly nine and a half months late.
The programme switched to Progress Override at Update 3. That P6 setting discards predecessor logic for in-progress activities, so the critical path, float, and forecast can understate real slippage from that point on.
Concealed slip climbed to 35 working days. Restoring each activity's duration to the baseline value and recomputing shows the forecast is later than the dates alone admit — slip hidden by shaved durations.
BEI fell from 0.97 to 0.88 while DCMA quality held at 9 / 14. The structural quality is steady; the problem is delivery pace and how the slippage is being presented, not schedule hygiene.

On a real Project dashboard, clicking any row opens the underlying analysis report. Try the sample Health report, Comparison report, or Series report.

The Project dashboard is included with every ScheduleLens subscription — from $79/month (Single Project).

See plans →