ScheduleLens Demo — Commercial Office Construction

4 snapshots · ordered by schedule data date

+ Add snapshot Rename Archive

Forecast finish

ⓘ

Jul 5, 2029

was Jan 20, 2029

Plan: Jun 22, 2028 +12 months 13 days late

DCMA compliance

ⓘ

9 / 14

Watch

2 fails, 3 not assessed

Critical path (wd)

ⓘ

703

no change

Activities at risk

ⓘ

no change

Float ≤ 20 wd or negative

Trend across snapshots

DCMA score

9 / 14

stable

Forecast vs plan

+12 months 13 days late

worsening

Critical path (wd)

703 wd

worsening

Data date	Type	Forecast / Plan	DCMA	CP (wd)	At risk
Jan 5, 2026	Health	— plan Jun 8, 2028	9 / 14	688	40
Feb 4, 2026	Health	— plan Jun 15, 2028	9 / 14	693	40
Mar 6, 2026	Health	Jan 20, 2029 plan Jun 29, 2028	9 / 14	703	41
Apr 9, 2026	Health	Jul 5, 2029 plan Jun 22, 2028	9 / 14	703	41

Plan vs. forecast variance grew from 205 to 378 days late between Update 2 and Update 3 — the schedule's stored target says June 2028, but the EV trajectory says July 2029.
DCMA score is steady at 9 / 14 across all four snapshots. The schedule's structural quality is holding — the slippage is programme behaviour, not schedule-quality regression.
Critical path duration grew 15 working days between baseline and Update 2, then steadied as recovery measures took effect in Update 3.
Activities at risk moved from 40 to 41 — one more activity slipped onto the near-critical path during the foundation delays.

On a real Project dashboard, clicking any row opens the underlying analysis report. Try the sample Health report, Comparison report, or Series report.

Project dashboard is available on Monthly and Professional plans.